bestbarcoder.com

ILP: resulting light trails T lmax = 3 in .NET Integrating PDF 417 in .NET ILP: resulting light trails T lmax = 3

Table 19.5. ILP: resulting light trails T lmax = 3 using visual studio .net toaccess barcode pdf417 on asp.net web,windows application OneCode No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 PDF417 for .NET 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Light trails {1, 6, 7, 4} {1, 6, 7, 9} {1, 5, 8, 10} {2, 3, 4, 7} {2, 6, 7, 9} {2, 6, 8, 10} {3, 2, 1, 5} {3, 2, 6, 8} {4, 7, 6, 1} {4, 7, 8, 5} {4, 7, 9, 10} {5, 1, 2, 3} {5, 8, 7, 4} {5, 8, 6} {5, 8, 10, 9} {6, 8, 5, 1} {8, 6, 2, 3} {9, 7, 6, 1} {9, 7, 6, 2} {9, 7, 4, 3} {9, 10, 8, 5} {10, 8, 6, 2} {10, 9, 7, 4} Hops 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Accommodated s-d pairs (1, 4) (6, 4) (1, 6) (1, 7) (1, 9) (6, 7) (7, 9) (1, 8) (1, 10) (2, 4) (3, 4) (3, 7) (2, 6) (2, 7) (2, 9) (6, 9) (2, 8) (2, 10) (6, 8) (6, 10) (8, 10) (3, 2) (3, 1) (3, 5) (2, 1) (1, 5) (3, 6) (3, 8) (4, 6) (4, 1) (4, 7) (4, 8) (4, 5) (7, 8) (7, 5) (8, 5) (4, 9) (4, 10) (5, 2) (5, 3) (1, 2) (1, 3) (2, 3) (5, 8) (5, 7) (5, 4) (8, 7) (8, 4) (5, 6) (5, 10) (5, 9) (8, 9) (6, 5) (8, 3) (6, 3) (9, 1) (7, 6) (6, 1) (9, 6) (9, 2) (7, 2) (9, 7) (9, 4) (9, 3) (7, 4) (7, 3) (4, 3) (9, 10) (9, 8) (9, 5) (10, 5) (10, 8) (10, 6) (10, 2) (8, 6) (8, 2) (6, 2) (10, 9) (10, 7) (10, 4) Load 15 29 17 22 17 18 21 24 11 24 2 46 38 2 12 3 10 20 9 42 21 39 5.

19.6 Light trail hop-length limit: T lmax = 4 Table 19.6. Local best- t: resulting light trails T lmax = 3 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Light trails {1, 6, 7, 4} {1, 6, 7, 9} {1, 5, 8, 10} {2, 6, 7, 9} {2, 6, 8, 10} {3, 2, 1, 5} {3, 4, 7, 8} {4, 7, 6, 1} {4, 7, 8, 5} {4, 7, 9, 10} {5, 1, 2, 3} {5, 8, 7, 4} {5, 8, 10, 9} {8, 6, 2, 3} {9, 7, 6, 1} {9, 7, 6, 2} {9, 7, 4, 3} {9, 10, 8, 5} {10, 8, 6, 2} {10, 8, 7, 4} {2, 3, 4} {3, 2, 6} {5, 1, 6} {6, 1, 5} Hops 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 Accommodated s-d pairs (1, 4) (1, 6) (1, 7) (6, 4) (7, 4) (6, 7) (1, 9) (6, 9) (7, 9) (1, 10) (5, 8) (1, 8) (8, 10) (1, 5) (5, 10) (2, 9) (2, 6) (2, 7) (2, 10) (2, 8) (6, 8) (6, 10) (3, 2) (3, 1) (3, 5) (2, 1) (3, 8) (3, 7) (3, 4) (4, 7) (4, 8) (7, 8) (4, 6) (4, 1) (6, 1) (7, 6) (4, 5) (7, 5) (8, 5) (4, 9) (4, 10) (9, 10) (5, 2) (5, 3) (1, 2) (1, 3) (2, 3) (5, 4) (5, 7) (8, 7) (8, 4) (5, 9) (8, 9) (10, 9) (8, 3) (8, 6) (8, 2) (6, 3) (6, 2) (9, 1) (9, 7) (9, 6) (9, 2) (7, 2) (9, 3) (9, 4) (7, 3) (4, 3) (9, 5) (9, 8) (10, 8) (10, 5) (10, 2) (10, 6) (10, 4) (10, 7) (2, 4) (3, 6) (5, 6) (6, 5) Load 32 22 38 9 12 18 40 27 16 7 46 28 11 19 9 7 37 18 28 4 4 10 2 3. 19.6.1 Light trai .

net framework barcode pdf417 l hop-length limit: Tlmax = 3 When the light trail hop-length limit is set to T lmax = 3, requests between some node-pairs in the network shown in Fig. 19.8 have to be divided and allocated to multiple light trails.

More speci cally, the shortest paths between nodes 3 and 10 have hop lengths of 4. Therefore, the request between these two nodes cannot be accommodated on a single light trail. The traf c matrix preprocessing heuristic rearranges the original traf c d3,10 onto d3,8 and d8,10 .

Similarly, the request from node 10 to node 3 is aggregated onto the node-pair (10, 2) and (2, 3). The resulting traf c matrix is shown in Table 19.4.

Solving the ILP formulation with this modi ed traf c matrix gives an optimal solution consisting of 23 light trails as shown in Table 19.5. Experiments using both local best- t increasing and decreasing packing algorithms are performed, and the better solution with a result of 24 light trails is chosen.

The detailed results are shown in Table 19.6..

Copyright © bestbarcoder.com . All rights reserved.